To my funeral I could not go, on my schedule it was not.
With undeniable force, I was there, but not laid at rest.
One's life must be defined, managed, and given a slot.
Adherence to that is the measure of living done best.
Timed frames for duty and diligence are needed!
These planes of life you cannot refuse as if blind.
Meetings met at appointed times well heeded,
Have worth greater than mere presence of mind.
I check mark with glee a clocked event as done
A pleasure precisely so accomplished each one.
I could not go to my funeral as it wasn't planned
No allotment of my life listed was open to it.
While busy counting marks I was untimely banned
My worldly casket was shut and I lay restless within it.
Had I but defined an emptiness for the slots of calendar
The event could have been checked off as won.
I could sigh in pleasure for the penciled reminder.
But now I ask where love and life went undone.
Here in darkness I see regret, not for that which pleasured
in times done , but for that which was not so measured.
Kenneth Brahmer, 2009
Friday, September 18, 2009
Saturday, September 12, 2009
It's time for revolution!
Today I received yet another email from our President...asking me to write congress urging them to support his health reform...and asking for money to support the cause.
Citizens have funded campaigns in the selection of elected officials. Why should citizens continue to pay for their elected officials to do their job? I pay taxes and they receive salaries with immense perks with those taxes. I've already paid, damn it!
The problem, which our founding fathers did not desire, is that elected officials do not focus on serving the citizens of this nation. The congressional entanglements are more interested in what will get them re-elected and what they must do to satisfy their party...and that goes for the president too! The backroom games, the maneuvering, the party line guidance and the outright extortion or vote buying within congress has value only to special interests and not the populace at large.
Advanced citizenship for elected officials means they do things right and they do the right things according to a conscience devoted to the people.
Most of us do NOT get paid to arrive at our workplace and then expect to be paid extra to do our job...nor do we spend inordinate time at work trying to retain our job regardless of the survival of the company that employs us.
So here's my urging to congress. Quit screwing around and do your job!
And to the President, I say - if the only way you can get the right things done is to get more money from me, then I'm going to start by getting another President.
But to my fellow citizens, I say - it's time for revolution!
Citizens have funded campaigns in the selection of elected officials. Why should citizens continue to pay for their elected officials to do their job? I pay taxes and they receive salaries with immense perks with those taxes. I've already paid, damn it!
The problem, which our founding fathers did not desire, is that elected officials do not focus on serving the citizens of this nation. The congressional entanglements are more interested in what will get them re-elected and what they must do to satisfy their party...and that goes for the president too! The backroom games, the maneuvering, the party line guidance and the outright extortion or vote buying within congress has value only to special interests and not the populace at large.
Advanced citizenship for elected officials means they do things right and they do the right things according to a conscience devoted to the people.
Most of us do NOT get paid to arrive at our workplace and then expect to be paid extra to do our job...nor do we spend inordinate time at work trying to retain our job regardless of the survival of the company that employs us.
So here's my urging to congress. Quit screwing around and do your job!
And to the President, I say - if the only way you can get the right things done is to get more money from me, then I'm going to start by getting another President.
But to my fellow citizens, I say - it's time for revolution!
Friday, August 21, 2009
Insurance is NOT health care reform!
My fellow Americans (grin):
After days and many hours spent reviewing data sources, fact checkers, census reports, politician statements, truth reports and commentaries about health care in the USA, it is clear to me that Orwell was an optimist regarding the manipulation of language and communication functions. As for statistics the old saying applies, 'Liars figure and figures lie.' You can construct an argument for or against with significant 'factual reference' and 'truth' evades logic.
There are three facts about health care reform which seem most clear:
1. There isn't just one bill. The legislative process has many miles to go before each chamber enacts a final version of reform -- if it gets that far. What "THE" bill will include is mutable.
2. The federal government has a poor track record in accomplishing the stated promises of social programs. The bureaucratic entities managing them are ever increasing in cost as are the programs they administer. The real costs have never been as were initially estimated.
3. The various legislative and administration processes address insurance - not health care improvement. If there is a direct correlation between health care insurance and the quality of health care, I cannot find it. More people insured does not equate to better health care for the average citizen. It means more money for the insurance industry.
Wouldn't it be nice if Congress and the President could improve the quality of health care for everyone nationwide for less money?
Yes, but are they, can they and will they?
[If you are holding your breath for this to happen you will not be improving your health care!]
http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/
After days and many hours spent reviewing data sources, fact checkers, census reports, politician statements, truth reports and commentaries about health care in the USA, it is clear to me that Orwell was an optimist regarding the manipulation of language and communication functions. As for statistics the old saying applies, 'Liars figure and figures lie.' You can construct an argument for or against with significant 'factual reference' and 'truth' evades logic.
There are three facts about health care reform which seem most clear:
1. There isn't just one bill. The legislative process has many miles to go before each chamber enacts a final version of reform -- if it gets that far. What "THE" bill will include is mutable.
2. The federal government has a poor track record in accomplishing the stated promises of social programs. The bureaucratic entities managing them are ever increasing in cost as are the programs they administer. The real costs have never been as were initially estimated.
3. The various legislative and administration processes address insurance - not health care improvement. If there is a direct correlation between health care insurance and the quality of health care, I cannot find it. More people insured does not equate to better health care for the average citizen. It means more money for the insurance industry.
Wouldn't it be nice if Congress and the President could improve the quality of health care for everyone nationwide for less money?
Yes, but are they, can they and will they?
[If you are holding your breath for this to happen you will not be improving your health care!]
http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/
Thursday, August 13, 2009
This is the most salient question on health reform !!
Tom Coburn, a U.S.Senator from Oklahoma and a medical doctor, raised concerns in his article of 10 August 2009 regarding "health-care reform" entitled 'Ten Questions Politicians Won’t Answer.' [Source article]
You may hold issue with some or most of the Ten Questions, but there is one which I think is the most salient, most prominent of all. The way he put it was, "How will a government-run public option perform better than other failing government programs, such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Indian Health Care?"
To that I will add numerous other government programs, oversight and regulatory agencies that have failed to accomplish what was their original intent.
One example of failure comes to mind as a fair measure. The Department of Energy. (see details below *)
Another example is the Federal Reserve.
The Social Security system was originally defined with some simple goals. Subsequently it has been altered by congress over the years with incremental additions and coverage which now put its costs orders of magnitude greater than originally described and defined.
Our history is replete with examples of governmental ineptitude and inefficiency in management of efforts to "do something" about issues that were deemed beyond the private sector and individuals themselves. In the great majority of these government added little value and made it worse.
Some facets of life should not be subjected to governmental intrusion. One of them is my health. To measure, I ask what is the practical and sustainable value added? What government has done to date has made the health cost problems we face today...caused by legislation, lawyers and insurance companies. All three of these enhance themselves by the "reforms" being presented.
At the risk of improperly quoting the saying, I believe that government that governs least governs best.
* On August 4, 1977, President Jimmy Carter signed the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Organization Act (Public Law 95-91), centralizing the responsibilities of the Federal Energy Administration, the Energy Research and Development Administration, the Federal Power Commission and other energy-related government programs into a single presidential cabinet-level department. The DOE, activated on Oct. 1, 1977, provided the framework for a comprehensive national energy plan by coordinating federal energy functions. The new Department was responsible for long-term, high-risk research and development of energy technology, federal power marketing, energy conservation, energy regulatory programs, a central energy data collection and analysis program, and nuclear weapons research, development and production.
In simple terms, in the 1970's an Arab oil squeeze threatened to strangle U.S. commerce and transportation. To prevent this from occurring in the future, the DOE was established with a clear understanding it was to develop means to avoid our dependence upon foreign oil and it's leverage against our country.
For FY2009 the DOE requested a budget of $25 billion dollars and noted approximately $200 billion expended in the past eight years. It began with about 20,000 employees with a budget of $10.4 billion. The number of people employed and the offices established now are greater.
Yet, the U.S. dependence upon foreign oil is even greater today than in 1977...much much greater. And that department has not developed other energy sources. All of the fine goals and promises for the changes made came to nothing and worse.
You may hold issue with some or most of the Ten Questions, but there is one which I think is the most salient, most prominent of all. The way he put it was, "How will a government-run public option perform better than other failing government programs, such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Indian Health Care?"
To that I will add numerous other government programs, oversight and regulatory agencies that have failed to accomplish what was their original intent.
One example of failure comes to mind as a fair measure. The Department of Energy. (see details below *)
Another example is the Federal Reserve.
The Social Security system was originally defined with some simple goals. Subsequently it has been altered by congress over the years with incremental additions and coverage which now put its costs orders of magnitude greater than originally described and defined.
Our history is replete with examples of governmental ineptitude and inefficiency in management of efforts to "do something" about issues that were deemed beyond the private sector and individuals themselves. In the great majority of these government added little value and made it worse.
Some facets of life should not be subjected to governmental intrusion. One of them is my health. To measure, I ask what is the practical and sustainable value added? What government has done to date has made the health cost problems we face today...caused by legislation, lawyers and insurance companies. All three of these enhance themselves by the "reforms" being presented.
At the risk of improperly quoting the saying, I believe that government that governs least governs best.
* On August 4, 1977, President Jimmy Carter signed the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Organization Act (Public Law 95-91), centralizing the responsibilities of the Federal Energy Administration, the Energy Research and Development Administration, the Federal Power Commission and other energy-related government programs into a single presidential cabinet-level department. The DOE, activated on Oct. 1, 1977, provided the framework for a comprehensive national energy plan by coordinating federal energy functions. The new Department was responsible for long-term, high-risk research and development of energy technology, federal power marketing, energy conservation, energy regulatory programs, a central energy data collection and analysis program, and nuclear weapons research, development and production.
In simple terms, in the 1970's an Arab oil squeeze threatened to strangle U.S. commerce and transportation. To prevent this from occurring in the future, the DOE was established with a clear understanding it was to develop means to avoid our dependence upon foreign oil and it's leverage against our country.
For FY2009 the DOE requested a budget of $25 billion dollars and noted approximately $200 billion expended in the past eight years. It began with about 20,000 employees with a budget of $10.4 billion. The number of people employed and the offices established now are greater.
Yet, the U.S. dependence upon foreign oil is even greater today than in 1977...much much greater. And that department has not developed other energy sources. All of the fine goals and promises for the changes made came to nothing and worse.
Friday, July 03, 2009
Black like me excuses
You're black? So?
I was raised in the deep south at a time and place where negroid people were treated as a separate race, with separate public facilities, separate social structures and separate rights. Since that time many social changes in America have addressed the plight of negroes. Despite the legal destruction of "separate but equal" judgement for negroes, they are still treated as a separate race in the affairs of daily living...often because negroes enjoy the advantage of being treated with separate distinction. It is still heard as the cause of unrest, that negroes were slaves and their descendants suffer as victims of that enslavement.
I never learned to think of negroes as inferior due to difference from me. I do not have a bigot's view so that I abhor negroes or consider them with negative prejudice.
I do however, abhor the "negro excuse" employed by so many to be treated as victims in this day and time. I am prejudiced against irresponsibility, stupidity, the purposely ignorant and those who do not contribute as members of the human race.
You're black? So? And I'm not! So?
If you are a negro and feel you are a victim because of it, read below to learn you yourself are not a victim anymore than any person in this country. Do something positive to rid yourself of the "negro excuse."
If you are not a negro and feel negroes are unimportant to your society, make no impact on your life or are inherently inferior, read below to learn differently. Do something positive to rid yourself of prejudiced behavior or thought regarding negroes.
The first black slaves were enslaved by other black tribes (a common occurence in Africa) and sold to traders who brought them to America beginning in 1619. In 1808 United States law banned import of slaves. No person alive today was brought to this country as a slave. The immensely greater majority of negroes in this country are not first, second, third or even fourth generation offspring of slaves.
So many negroes have distinquished themselves as significant contributors to our daily lives, that to somehow erase the presence of negroes in our past would severely impoverish our society. Their existence is proof that there is no valid "negro excuse" for blacks that they are unable or prevented from improving themselves and society today. Every ethnic or other grouping in this country is a "victim" of prejudice from some other group. There is nothing unique in encountering difficulty in life because you are labelled as a member of a group disdained by another group more interested in advancing members of their group. But that has not prevented any one individual or group from advancement.
Blacks have been achieving presence and recognition at all levels of society for a century. Albeit, persons without talent, intelligence or drive have not and that applies to all of us. Here are examples:
1920
Lucy Slowe became the first black woman tennis champion in the United States. During a tournament in Baltimore, she won the woman's singles title.
1921
Bessie Coleman became the first United States black female pilot.
1924
Clifton Reginald Wharton, Sr. became the first black to pass United States Foreign Service exam.
1939
Jane Matilda Bolin became the first black woman judge in New York City.
1950
Ralph Bunche became the first black to receive the Nobel Peace Prize.
Charles Cooper became the first black player in NBA. He played for the Fort Wayne Indiana Celtics.
1947 Jackie Robinson
* The first African-American to play on a Major League baseball team in the 20th century.
* The first Rookie of the Year Award is awarded to Jackie Robinson.
* The first African-American to be inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame.
* The first Major League baseball player to be honored on a U.S. postage stamp.
* The first baseball player to have his uniform number (42) retired across all teams by the Major League.
* The first UCLA student to earn a varsity letter in all four sports: baseball, basketball, football and track.
* The first African-American baseball player to receive the Congressional Gold Medal.
* The first African-American to serve as Vice-President of a major American corporation, Chock Full O' Nuts 1957-1964.
1954
Benjamin O. Davis, Jr. became the first first black general in the United States Air Force.
1955
Marian Anderson became the first black singer at the Metropolitan Opera.
1957
Althea Gibson became the first black tennis player to win a Wimbledon singles title.
1958
William O'Ree became the first black hockey player in the NHL, playing for the Boston Bruins.
Ruth Carol Taylor became the first black woman to become a stewardess.
Clifton R. Wharton became the first black US foreign minister.
Learn the value of contributing members of society -
History is repleat with examples of slavery. Consider the Hebrews of ancient Egypt. I have never met a Jewish person who expected advantage in compensation for their ancestors having been slaves.
I was raised in the deep south at a time and place where negroid people were treated as a separate race, with separate public facilities, separate social structures and separate rights. Since that time many social changes in America have addressed the plight of negroes. Despite the legal destruction of "separate but equal" judgement for negroes, they are still treated as a separate race in the affairs of daily living...often because negroes enjoy the advantage of being treated with separate distinction. It is still heard as the cause of unrest, that negroes were slaves and their descendants suffer as victims of that enslavement.
I never learned to think of negroes as inferior due to difference from me. I do not have a bigot's view so that I abhor negroes or consider them with negative prejudice.
I do however, abhor the "negro excuse" employed by so many to be treated as victims in this day and time. I am prejudiced against irresponsibility, stupidity, the purposely ignorant and those who do not contribute as members of the human race.
You're black? So? And I'm not! So?
If you are a negro and feel you are a victim because of it, read below to learn you yourself are not a victim anymore than any person in this country. Do something positive to rid yourself of the "negro excuse."
If you are not a negro and feel negroes are unimportant to your society, make no impact on your life or are inherently inferior, read below to learn differently. Do something positive to rid yourself of prejudiced behavior or thought regarding negroes.
The first black slaves were enslaved by other black tribes (a common occurence in Africa) and sold to traders who brought them to America beginning in 1619. In 1808 United States law banned import of slaves. No person alive today was brought to this country as a slave. The immensely greater majority of negroes in this country are not first, second, third or even fourth generation offspring of slaves.
So many negroes have distinquished themselves as significant contributors to our daily lives, that to somehow erase the presence of negroes in our past would severely impoverish our society. Their existence is proof that there is no valid "negro excuse" for blacks that they are unable or prevented from improving themselves and society today. Every ethnic or other grouping in this country is a "victim" of prejudice from some other group. There is nothing unique in encountering difficulty in life because you are labelled as a member of a group disdained by another group more interested in advancing members of their group. But that has not prevented any one individual or group from advancement.
Blacks have been achieving presence and recognition at all levels of society for a century. Albeit, persons without talent, intelligence or drive have not and that applies to all of us. Here are examples:
1920
Lucy Slowe became the first black woman tennis champion in the United States. During a tournament in Baltimore, she won the woman's singles title.
1921
Bessie Coleman became the first United States black female pilot.
1924
Clifton Reginald Wharton, Sr. became the first black to pass United States Foreign Service exam.
1939
Jane Matilda Bolin became the first black woman judge in New York City.
1950
Ralph Bunche became the first black to receive the Nobel Peace Prize.
Charles Cooper became the first black player in NBA. He played for the Fort Wayne Indiana Celtics.
1947 Jackie Robinson
* The first African-American to play on a Major League baseball team in the 20th century.
* The first Rookie of the Year Award is awarded to Jackie Robinson.
* The first African-American to be inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame.
* The first Major League baseball player to be honored on a U.S. postage stamp.
* The first baseball player to have his uniform number (42) retired across all teams by the Major League.
* The first UCLA student to earn a varsity letter in all four sports: baseball, basketball, football and track.
* The first African-American baseball player to receive the Congressional Gold Medal.
* The first African-American to serve as Vice-President of a major American corporation, Chock Full O' Nuts 1957-1964.
1954
Benjamin O. Davis, Jr. became the first first black general in the United States Air Force.
1955
Marian Anderson became the first black singer at the Metropolitan Opera.
1957
Althea Gibson became the first black tennis player to win a Wimbledon singles title.
1958
William O'Ree became the first black hockey player in the NHL, playing for the Boston Bruins.
Ruth Carol Taylor became the first black woman to become a stewardess.
Clifton R. Wharton became the first black US foreign minister.
Learn the value of contributing members of society -
Apollo Theater
http://apollotheater.org/
BIO's Black History Study Guides
http://www.biography.com/classroom/blackhistory.jsp
History.com's Voices of Civil Rights Site
http://www.history.com/classroom/voices/
History.com's Black History Site
http://www.history.com/minisites/blackhistory
The King Center
http://www.thekingcenter.org/tkc/index.asp
Library of Congress - African-American Mosiac Exhibit
http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/intro.html
Library of Congress - African-American History Month
http://www.loc.gov/topics/africanamericans/
National Underground Railroad Freedom Center
http://www.freedomcenter.org/
National Visionary Leadership Project
http://www.visionaryproject.org/index.asp
National Civil Rights Museum
http://www.civilrightsmuseum.org/home.htm
An MLK site with documents from the National Archives:
www.archives.gov/education/lessons/memphis-v-mlk/
History Classroom Brown v. Board of Education minisite:
http://www.history.com/classroom/brownvboard/
History is repleat with examples of slavery. Consider the Hebrews of ancient Egypt. I have never met a Jewish person who expected advantage in compensation for their ancestors having been slaves.
Monday, June 22, 2009
Twenty-twenty hindsight is often bashed as "easy for you" to affix blame. But it also allows you to examine the flaws which lead to disaster. So this is about an hour's worth of simple research from which I draw some conclusions that you might want to consider as you think about what you can do to determine cause not blame.
Whose work is 1000 times worth more than yours? Here's some of the gurus that helped make the current financial crisis what it is today:
- Royal Bank of Scotland:£9.6m pay package for chief executive Stephen Hester.
- HSBC: Michael Geoghegan receives a basic salary of £1.1m and a long-term incentive of £7.5m.
- Lloyds: Eric Daniels is paid an annual £1m in basic salary, plus a maximum of 200 per cent of salary, or £2m, as a long-term incentive.
- Citigroup: Vikram Pandit was awarded a $10.8m compensation package for 2008.
- MasterCard: recruited Mr Banga a $4.2m signing-on fee and stock and options worth about $7m.
- Merrill Lynch: executive vice president Peter Kraus leaves with more than $10 million in compensation. (500 lose their jobs)
- Merrill Lynch: Peter Kraus received a payout of $25 million dollars for working at Merrill Lynch for just three months.
- Merrill Lynch: Just before being taken over by Bank of America $4 Billion was paid as bonuses to executives.
- Citi senior exeutive Ajay Banga leaves to join MasterCard as president and chief operating officer. He is in line to become chief executive of the credit card company next year. MasterCard is paying Ajay Banga a $4.2m signing-on fee and stock and options worth about $7m.
I stopped looking at the large array of exhorbitant executive compensation packages. I'd seen enough to know.
How is money handled by those in positions of control?
- A former Morgan Stanley vice president (36 year old Richard Garaventa Jr.) has been charged with embezzling
more than $2.5 million from the investment bank. - A former China head of Morgan Stanley Real Estate is being investigated by the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission for possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
The S.E.C. believes that Mr. Peterson violated the act to make several property deals for the bank in China. - Bernard Madoff (one-time Nasdaq chairman) caused $50 billion in losses - perhaps the biggest scam in Wall Street history.
- Texas billionaire R. Allen Stanford (Stanford Financial Group) was jailed on charges his international banking empire was a Ponzi scheme built on lies, bluster and bribery. More than $1 billion from Stanford's alleged scheme remains unaccounted for, and if anyone has access to it, it's Stanford.
I stopped looking at the financial criminals of this past year. I'd seen enough to know.
- 40 banks failed/closed so far in 2009 in just three states Georgia, North Carolina and Kansas.
In the past year (as of June 2009) 99 banks failed according to the FDIC.
The FDIC expects roughly $70 billion in losses due to the failures of insured institutions over the next 5 years. - $700 billion in bailout money to faltering financial institutions.
- AIG $100 billion bailout by the U.S. government
- For 30 years of incompetence by American auto companies leads to sales off more than 30%...and requests for $34 Billion bailout by the U.S.Government to forestall meltdown.
- CitiGroup 75,000 job cuts and $20 billion handout from the U.S. government and backing $300+ billion of its toxic assets to keep it from collapsing. Most of these were off-the-books Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs).
- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac balance sheets riddled with toxic assets and the equity holders were wiped out.
- Money market funds, auction-rate securities, the Reserve Fund, Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) decimate Wall Street with loses in supposedly secure investments that were given the AAA seal of approval by the ratings agencies.
- Moody's, Standard & Poors and Fitch gave AAA top ratings for Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs), which are based in part on pools of subprime mortgages. These agencies get paid by the issuers of the CDOs to make a supposed objective rating.
- Hedge funds - see Bernie Madoff and his $50 Billion scam.
- Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan whose reputation was deemed infallible, erred terribly in the risks in the system from subprime mortgages
and the bonds sold against them. So he admits.
In spite of the troubled environment, market rates for bankers has changed, improving the pay for bankers partly driven by a need to hold on to good staff – and partly to offset the threat of bonus taxes or caps in the US – UBS, Merrill and Morgan Stanley have all increased their basic pay substantially. Citi now plans to do the same. According to insiders and rivals, market salary rates for managing directors have jumped from about $250,000 (€180,000) only a few months ago, to closer to $400,000. As well as base salary hikes, banks are once more offering guaranteed bonuses to staff approached with lucrative offers by rivals.
Regulators will be concerned – increasing basic pay and guaranteeing bonuses run
directly counter to their efforts to push banks towards pay that better reflects
long-term performance.
Despite the many areas, layers and levels of financial managers; despite
the oversight and national financial regulation by the Federal Reserve, the
Security and Exchange markets; the gurus of the market and the corporate might
which has never been so massive - systemic failure!
Many of the money managers, despite reputations and ratings, are corrupt,
inept, dishonest, and seemingly beyond the reach of laws in any effective manner.
Of all those affected, the average "have not" citizen will suffer the most and those inthe "have" positions will recover soonest.
These are elements which have historically lead to revolution. And in many casesthese have resulted in autocratic rule emerging even where revolution was fomentedto ease the burden of the average person. Almost always the means by which autocrats achieve this - the promise of change and them at the hand of the government which first represses opposition (and thereafter ever increasing).
Beware Greeks bearing gifts, orators promising a return of glory and the
arrogance of the wealthy. Thus will the meek inherit the earth following
armeggedon.
Nothing! Like 300 million citizens will do. You'll sit back and take it. You hope
some charasmatic leader will come to the rescue. You'll seek your personal level of
greed, safety and satisfaction by working around the system to simply survive.
I ask you how could one percent of the population impoverish the ninety-nine percent without that segment's fear, apathy or willing acceptance?
Sunday, April 05, 2009
How did things get so bad and what now?
Japan once found itself trying to recover from disaster after WWII in much the same conditions as the United States now finds itself. At that time it was generally accepted that anything "Made in Japan" was of little value. In fact, one manufacturing town made use of its name which was Usa to label its products "Made in USA" (Usa, Japan is located in Oita Prefecture on Kyushu Island and was so named a thousand years before WWII). Today "Made in USA" does not carry the distinction it once had. Competitors in Japan and China have overtaken the USA marketplace in quality, price and quantity. So much so, that a significant number of daily use items can only be obtained via Japan or China because US manufacturers could no longer compete and quit.
So how did we get where we are now and how did Japan surpass us?
It is convenient, if not totally accurate, to place the blame for the US economic collapse on various political entities who served the populace poorly. Be that as it may, closer examination reveals that at the base of the economic pyramid, the value of significant national products have greatly weakened due to the practices and leadership of our production as manufacturers of the finest and best. The automobile industry is good example. And so as government officials often do, they throw money at the "problem" but it rarely does more than entrench the problem.
We don't produce much...and not the finest and best. That applies to most of our institutions and providers. Education does not produce as it once did. Manufacturers do not produce well. Government does not serve as well. The populace does not contribute citizenship as well. Our military is inept under the existing conditions and forms of conflict. Even our religious entities do not serve as well. You may argue. However, what some consider "as well" is not good enough if not bad. That is how we got here. Fingers point almost in every direction except towards the pointer himself. But that is where the problem resides.
That was Japan 1946. What did it do? Unsung leaders gathered to recruit and follow the business and cultural methods of an American. Dr. William Edwards Deming.
Deming's 14 points
1. Create constancy of purpose.
2. Adopt the new philosophy.
3. Cease dependence on mass inspection to achieve quality.
4. Minimize total cost, not initial price of supplies.
5. Improve constantly the system of production and service.
6. Institute training on the job.
7. Institute leadership.
8. Drive out fear.
9. Break down barriers between departments.
10. Eliminate slogans, exhortations, and numerical targets.
11. Eliminate work standards (quotas) and management by objective.
12. Remove barriers that rob workers, engineers, and managers of their right to pride of workmanship.
13. Institute a vigorous program of education and self-improvement.
14. Put everyone in the company to work to accomplish the transformation.
If we want change...the above explains what that change must be like.
You will note that the above isn't something you should expect government, industry and commerce should do for YOU. It is what everyone must do in everything they do and that includes your personal efforts.
http://www.lii.net/deming.html
http://www.managementwisdom.com/index.html?gclid=COSG9aPZ2pkCFQZlswod81n8Wg
http://www.4ulr.com/products/productquality/jedwardsdemingphil.html
So how did we get where we are now and how did Japan surpass us?
It is convenient, if not totally accurate, to place the blame for the US economic collapse on various political entities who served the populace poorly. Be that as it may, closer examination reveals that at the base of the economic pyramid, the value of significant national products have greatly weakened due to the practices and leadership of our production as manufacturers of the finest and best. The automobile industry is good example. And so as government officials often do, they throw money at the "problem" but it rarely does more than entrench the problem.
We don't produce much...and not the finest and best. That applies to most of our institutions and providers. Education does not produce as it once did. Manufacturers do not produce well. Government does not serve as well. The populace does not contribute citizenship as well. Our military is inept under the existing conditions and forms of conflict. Even our religious entities do not serve as well. You may argue. However, what some consider "as well" is not good enough if not bad. That is how we got here. Fingers point almost in every direction except towards the pointer himself. But that is where the problem resides.
That was Japan 1946. What did it do? Unsung leaders gathered to recruit and follow the business and cultural methods of an American. Dr. William Edwards Deming.
Deming's 14 points
1. Create constancy of purpose.
2. Adopt the new philosophy.
3. Cease dependence on mass inspection to achieve quality.
4. Minimize total cost, not initial price of supplies.
5. Improve constantly the system of production and service.
6. Institute training on the job.
7. Institute leadership.
8. Drive out fear.
9. Break down barriers between departments.
10. Eliminate slogans, exhortations, and numerical targets.
11. Eliminate work standards (quotas) and management by objective.
12. Remove barriers that rob workers, engineers, and managers of their right to pride of workmanship.
13. Institute a vigorous program of education and self-improvement.
14. Put everyone in the company to work to accomplish the transformation.
If we want change...the above explains what that change must be like.
You will note that the above isn't something you should expect government, industry and commerce should do for YOU. It is what everyone must do in everything they do and that includes your personal efforts.
http://www.lii.net/deming.html
http://www.managementwisdom.com/index.html?gclid=COSG9aPZ2pkCFQZlswod81n8Wg
http://www.4ulr.com/products/productquality/jedwardsdemingphil.html
Friday, January 30, 2009
Obama Stocks White House With Lawyers
Well, I won't be the first, and likely not the last, to suggest that lawyers make poor government managers. However, many attorneys from both parties marvel at the sheer number of lawyers Obama has appointed or nominated so far, particularly at the White House counsel's office, which will have at least 22 attorneys working under counsel Greg Craig. That's more than twice as large as the office was under Bush, with three deputy counsels, the special ethics counsel and 18 associate and deputy associate counsels.
Of course, President Obama is a lawyer as are a great majority of Democrat Party VIPs. Also, almost all of the appointed lawyers are liberal minded.
Why is this a concern?
Lawyers are disciplined to address issues, problems and challenges in legal terms. Got a problem? Pass a law! Invoke the law! Change the law! Take it to a court of law for resolution!
How does a lawyer do that? He talks. He writes. He persuades with words. In essence, a lawyer will express the wishes of a client and addresses matters in terms of what he is willing to go to court about. These are legislative approaches, not executive actions.
As almost anyone who observes our judicial system can attest, any court make make a ruling...but that doesn't make it happen. As almost anyone who observes our legislative system, laws abound which cannot be enforced, are not enforced and often ignored by the judicial system.
Ask a company or corporate lawyer if it's okay to do something for which there is no legal precedent, and he will most likely say there is too great a risk...no!
Ask any member of congress if he is able to personally compile his own income tax return. Yet, congress passes every tax law and the morass of legal expressions therein are difficult even for experts. Worse, massive bureaucratic organizations exist to attempt to enforce and act upon these laws.
As most teenagers have heard, "saying it, doesn't make it so."
President Obama and a majority of lawyers in his employ, concern themselves with what is legal...not moral...not practical...not what is doable...not even what is economically sound! What's that you say? There ought to be a law?
Abraham Lincoln faced a similar dilemma...legally states had no right to withdraw from the union...it took the military of the North, Ulysses Grant and half the males on both sides to make it happen. Lincoln was a Republican lawyer.
My concern is that there are talkers and there are doers. I don't see enough doers to back up what the talkers are saying.
Mother said, "Actions speak louder than words!"
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
No iterative improvements - change
President Barack Obama and many lawmakers want to use infrastructure projects to create jobs. The House was expected to pass an $825 billion economic stimulus bill on Wednesday. Of that money, $150 billion would go to fixing infrastructure.
Our infrastructure requires more...much much more. At least
$1 TRILLION to restore aviation, bridges, roads, waterways, drinking water, waste water, dams, hazardous waste, solid waste, schools, rail, energy, levee, inland waterways, transit and public park systems. That is according to estimates EPA, NEA, and engineers. A significant portion of that is a continuing annual maintenance increase and not just a one time fix.
These "fixes" are iterative measures to sustain the existing systems. This is not change but more costs for the same stuff.
Considering the shortfall, cost and efficiency...we need to step back and review our priorities and develop innovative, more efficient, practical, long term and perhaps revolutionary changes to arrive at sustainable infrastructure. Instead of increasing the size of the box, we need to think outside the box and what goes into the box.
Our infrastructure requires more...much much more. At least
$1 TRILLION to restore aviation, bridges, roads, waterways, drinking water, waste water, dams, hazardous waste, solid waste, schools, rail, energy, levee, inland waterways, transit and public park systems. That is according to estimates EPA, NEA, and engineers. A significant portion of that is a continuing annual maintenance increase and not just a one time fix.These "fixes" are iterative measures to sustain the existing systems. This is not change but more costs for the same stuff.
Considering the shortfall, cost and efficiency...we need to step back and review our priorities and develop innovative, more efficient, practical, long term and perhaps revolutionary changes to arrive at sustainable infrastructure. Instead of increasing the size of the box, we need to think outside the box and what goes into the box.
Wednesday, January 07, 2009
I recently read a comment by a reader regarding US automaker bailouts and "Buy American" :
you want us to "step up".......the gov't wants us to "step up".........the car makers certainly want us to "step up"...........try this one:
buy an American car....get a lifetime guarantee for the vehicle....yes, we've gotta maintain the vehicle, etc, etc......but, no tricky clauses, no "gotcha's".......plain language
You, the Buyer, get a lifetime warranty....PERIOD!
it's good for the car industry, it's good for the autoworkers, it's good for the tax revenue for the local and national economies.........and it's good for us , singularly and collectively
I'd like to piggy back on that idea:
The majority of Americans have a car payment in their budget...and there always seems to be one year after year. The budget also has a maintenance of car expense.
We as a nation are trying to become fuel efficient. We need to reverse the loss of industry technology and jobs in the US. The budget also requires an insurance expense. So how much is the cost of vehicle, maintenance, insurance, repair etc. over the complete lifecycle of transport means...for the average automobile owner today?
Suppose:
Suppose you could acquire a fuel efficient basic no luxury automobile...much like a lease except that full lifetime maintenance would be included. And suppose the car manufacturer determined the lifetime cycle of that car and replaced it when it became more practical than repairs it was doing. Suppose that the funding (for awhile) for the process was guaranteed by the government based upon the car manufacturer producing said automobile with specified and improving gas mileage or equivalent in alternate energy sources? And suppose the manufacturer was required to perform safety inspections on these cars as they cycled through their dealer's garages. Suppose they also covered repair/replacement from accident (mechanical coverage only). And since most manufacturers have an appendage corporation that makes loans, they would have to provide such loans based upon very prudent requirements.
Now say, you didn't have to take your car to the dealer to be serviced but could go wherever you wished...manufacturer support etc. is dropped...but it's your choice.
Now say you didn't have to get one of these low cost no frills cars with efficient gas mileage...no problem, buy what you like and care for it as you wish.
American citizens only! American made only. No contracting out to foreign companies for parts, labor, design etc.
Now there are various considerations that need to be built in to make this work, however this is only a concept paper.
What might the impact be regarding this (E)conomy-based (T)ransport - et-car:
For this et-car:
1. Two, four and six people versions...et2, et3, et4 cars...maybe
2. The two people version might be a three wheel very economical, minimal speed, vehicle with few amenities like one of the types currently coming into the market.
Gets you from point A to point B protected from weather with groceries at 45 MPG at max speed of 55mph. All might just be one color.
3. Economical life cycle considered. data, maintenance, et-car identity, insurance-repair-replacement-reuse-recycle
For the populace:
1. People regardless of income bracket could get suitable basic transportation... with no repair surprises, insured, safe, affordable, guaranteed transportation for a single monthly fee. Quality improvement.
2. More American made jobs
3. Potentially safer for all travelers
4. Government support for re-education for needed skills to produce everything in the US.
For the manufacturer/business:
1. Government financial support for re-design development
2. Guaranteed investment return for quality versus repair costs
3. Government support for start of businesses supporting the e-cars parts
4. More American made business
5. a standard sized et-car for more efficient parking facilities
For the nation:
1, Lowe unemployment
2, Bailout with targeted results
3. Return of technology and technicians
4. Effective use of job core type social programs in education and employment
Needed:
Departments Labor, transportation, treasury, HEW, etc. coordination - one heck of a lot of political power pressure with squabble suppression ability. Automaker acceptance or no bailout.
It has been said that Henry Ford had a vision of the common man being able to have automobile transportation within his means - and he created an industry to do that which enhanced the industrial might of the US AND provided a good job for employees.
It's time to do that again.
you want us to "step up".......the gov't wants us to "step up".........the car makers certainly want us to "step up"...........try this one:
buy an American car....get a lifetime guarantee for the vehicle....yes, we've gotta maintain the vehicle, etc, etc......but, no tricky clauses, no "gotcha's".......plain language
You, the Buyer, get a lifetime warranty....PERIOD!
it's good for the car industry, it's good for the autoworkers, it's good for the tax revenue for the local and national economies.........and it's good for us , singularly and collectively
I'd like to piggy back on that idea:
The majority of Americans have a car payment in their budget...and there always seems to be one year after year. The budget also has a maintenance of car expense.
We as a nation are trying to become fuel efficient. We need to reverse the loss of industry technology and jobs in the US. The budget also requires an insurance expense. So how much is the cost of vehicle, maintenance, insurance, repair etc. over the complete lifecycle of transport means...for the average automobile owner today?
Suppose:
Suppose you could acquire a fuel efficient basic no luxury automobile...much like a lease except that full lifetime maintenance would be included. And suppose the car manufacturer determined the lifetime cycle of that car and replaced it when it became more practical than repairs it was doing. Suppose that the funding (for awhile) for the process was guaranteed by the government based upon the car manufacturer producing said automobile with specified and improving gas mileage or equivalent in alternate energy sources? And suppose the manufacturer was required to perform safety inspections on these cars as they cycled through their dealer's garages. Suppose they also covered repair/replacement from accident (mechanical coverage only). And since most manufacturers have an appendage corporation that makes loans, they would have to provide such loans based upon very prudent requirements.
Now say, you didn't have to take your car to the dealer to be serviced but could go wherever you wished...manufacturer support etc. is dropped...but it's your choice.
Now say you didn't have to get one of these low cost no frills cars with efficient gas mileage...no problem, buy what you like and care for it as you wish.
American citizens only! American made only. No contracting out to foreign companies for parts, labor, design etc.
Now there are various considerations that need to be built in to make this work, however this is only a concept paper.
What might the impact be regarding this (E)conomy-based (T)ransport - et-car:
For this et-car:
1. Two, four and six people versions...et2, et3, et4 cars...maybe
2. The two people version might be a three wheel very economical, minimal speed, vehicle with few amenities like one of the types currently coming into the market.
Gets you from point A to point B protected from weather with groceries at 45 MPG at max speed of 55mph. All might just be one color.
3. Economical life cycle considered. data, maintenance, et-car identity, insurance-repair-replacement-reuse-recycle
For the populace:
1. People regardless of income bracket could get suitable basic transportation... with no repair surprises, insured, safe, affordable, guaranteed transportation for a single monthly fee. Quality improvement.
2. More American made jobs
3. Potentially safer for all travelers
4. Government support for re-education for needed skills to produce everything in the US.
For the manufacturer/business:
1. Government financial support for re-design development
2. Guaranteed investment return for quality versus repair costs
3. Government support for start of businesses supporting the e-cars parts
4. More American made business
5. a standard sized et-car for more efficient parking facilities
For the nation:
1, Lowe unemployment
2, Bailout with targeted results
3. Return of technology and technicians
4. Effective use of job core type social programs in education and employment
Needed:
Departments Labor, transportation, treasury, HEW, etc. coordination - one heck of a lot of political power pressure with squabble suppression ability. Automaker acceptance or no bailout.
It has been said that Henry Ford had a vision of the common man being able to have automobile transportation within his means - and he created an industry to do that which enhanced the industrial might of the US AND provided a good job for employees.
It's time to do that again.
Sunday, January 04, 2009
Bright spark of newly discovered freedom
Just when you think you've awakened into an alternate world where nothing makes sense, you find something which accurately expresses your view of that world with style and reason.
Yahoo! Maintains a question and answer forum...you ask a question...anyone can answer and the answers are listed for all to view (including you).
Quite often you can tell by the questions and answers, that a majority come from youths, although quite serious questions are sometimes asked to which participants provide very helpful answers.
This one is a beauty:
| Does Anyone Know A Website for Cool Bebo Profile Names? Best Answer - Chosen by Voters 97% 405 Votes Let's get this straight, you're asking for a website from which you can pick and choose a "cool" profile name for your Bebo account. An account which is supposed to be a representative presentation of who you are and what you're about. Are you beginning to see the direction my argument is going in? Of course you haven't. I'll continue. Back in the old, dark days of the internet when men were men, women were men and children were FBI agents, no one cared what people thought of them. This was when the internet was still merely a bright spark of newly discovered freedom burning bright against the darkened backdrop of a world half enslaved by totalitarian freedom-hating governments, unscrupulous money grabbing corporations, backward millenia-old religions and millions upon millions of dead-eyed sheeple. The internet burned brightly as an escape, a way to show who you were to a wider audience, a way of discovering and sharing things you never knew existed, a way of forcing back the ever encroaching shadows of the real world to keep your internal flame burning just that little bit longer. The internet burned brighter and stronger as the rush of people to it acted as fuel to the fire, and the rush of companies to it was the oxygen it needed to sustain itself, and to grow. The Napster and Kazaa era came and went as the dark lords of the world attempted to wrestle back their power from this bastard child of technology and freedom that we know as the web. People pushed each other by finding, creating and sharing things that would have people in the old world hung, drawn and quartered but in this new space, this virtual plane of existence it did not solicit the fiery condemnation of preachers and politicians alike. We laughed. We saw these examples of hate, of destruction and of evil and we laughed and encouraged them; for it was not the same evil as that which ravaged the lands of the physical world, but an evil unsullied by power, money, dogma or time. This was new evil, strong evil, and pure evil. It shaped a generation and a way of life was born. The internet was no longer an escape from life, it was a mirror of it; a dark and distorting mirror in which our reflections are not always what we wanted, hoped or indeed expected to see. Bebo and such sites are like a swimming pool on an ocean liner, floating in the middle of the endless abyss of the internet. You get a taste of what it's like to be in the water, but you learn nothing of its depth, breadth or more unsavoury inhabitants. Whether we like it or not however, these fist-clenchingly corporately built sites are part and parcel of the modern internet. The reason for accepting them is that they are an easy way to share at least some tiny proportion of yourself with people. Show them what amuses you, what confuses you, what makes you you. You come before us, the anonymous masses to ask us for a "cool Bebo profile name" which you can use to impress your real life friends with just how stylish and original you are. We say to you that your attempt to bastardise the concepts of these halls will not be answered. Anyways, no I don't know any websites for cool bebo profile names. Good luck. |
The only attribution I can provide is that the comment was made by RBX. Of all the questions which RBX answered, half the time his answer was selected as the best. That ratio is higher than the greatest majority of those who participate.
You have my salutation of appreciation, RBX, whoever or whatever you are!
Thursday, December 18, 2008
Words tell you how things should be, action makes it happen.
If rules and regulations truly governed people, those ten commandments would be all that's needed. As extremists have shown us, the pen is NOT mightier than the sword.
We need the right people, doing the right things and doing them well...a job description doesn't make that happen. Words don't either.
While it is of value to encourage an exchange of views in determining the best course of action...some communicate via actions that words cannot combat. If they did, if talking with zealot enemies did any good, Neville Chamberlain would be the hero in WWII and Gen. Patton would just be a tank commander.
Prepare for action.
If rules and regulations truly governed people, those ten commandments would be all that's needed. As extremists have shown us, the pen is NOT mightier than the sword.
We need the right people, doing the right things and doing them well...a job description doesn't make that happen. Words don't either.
While it is of value to encourage an exchange of views in determining the best course of action...some communicate via actions that words cannot combat. If they did, if talking with zealot enemies did any good, Neville Chamberlain would be the hero in WWII and Gen. Patton would just be a tank commander.
Prepare for action.
Saturday, August 30, 2008
Beauty does not exclude ability or brains
Having once been a beauty queen does not make you stupid or unable to play the game.
presidential nominee since 1976, except for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school. Look at the
vast social class-action suit. We are citizens of a republic that promises us a great deal of freedom from laws, from courts, and from lawyers.
Supreme Court decision, who was the beneficiary ... the lawyers who got paid...no child gained a
thing.
Of course, that's just my opinion...I could be wrong.
Friday, August 22, 2008
Image USA - Not good?
Recently I was asked to comment on the image of the United States globally considering it is so negatively viewed and often reviled:
The USA image isn't reality but perception molded by media and political forces, many of which are greatly biased. History reveals that of the evils (as you might choose to say) committed by the USA, there are many other countries who have done the same. The point is not that the USA is no worse than others, but that it too has made mistakes.
However, no country has undertaken the restoration of countries damaged by warfare as greatly as the USA. No country has sustained an international forum for global care like the USA has with the UN, Red Cross, WHO etc. Charitable actions by NGO's from the USA are in more places and with more resources given, than ANY other country. The education institutes of the USA provide opportunity for more foreign students than any other country.
For all that is wrong of the USA, there is much more than equal good which is extended globally.
My view of the USA is that it suffers from an excess of riches that have rapidly come to a decline; that its citizens are apathetic, ungrateful, spoiled and naive; that its government is lethargic by its immense size and bureaucratic entanglements; and that it has wasted its resources and damaged its land with pollutants. These are the same faults as can be found in most countries. However, the USA is judged to be the worst because its citizens are generally better off that those of other countries and they are expected to behave better for it.
USA sins are deemed greater than the same sins of other countries, because of its greatness.
My $.02
The USA image isn't reality but perception molded by media and political forces, many of which are greatly biased. History reveals that of the evils (as you might choose to say) committed by the USA, there are many other countries who have done the same. The point is not that the USA is no worse than others, but that it too has made mistakes.
However, no country has undertaken the restoration of countries damaged by warfare as greatly as the USA. No country has sustained an international forum for global care like the USA has with the UN, Red Cross, WHO etc. Charitable actions by NGO's from the USA are in more places and with more resources given, than ANY other country. The education institutes of the USA provide opportunity for more foreign students than any other country.
For all that is wrong of the USA, there is much more than equal good which is extended globally.
My view of the USA is that it suffers from an excess of riches that have rapidly come to a decline; that its citizens are apathetic, ungrateful, spoiled and naive; that its government is lethargic by its immense size and bureaucratic entanglements; and that it has wasted its resources and damaged its land with pollutants. These are the same faults as can be found in most countries. However, the USA is judged to be the worst because its citizens are generally better off that those of other countries and they are expected to behave better for it.
USA sins are deemed greater than the same sins of other countries, because of its greatness.
My $.02
Monday, June 23, 2008
Monday, June 09, 2008
Why people behaved the way they did
Well, I suppose that everyone cared what their neighbors thought of them and at least tried to be civil to those that didn't. While a rich kid with lots of toys was great to visit, we still preferred to go home. And if visiting us, that kid threatened to take his marbles and go home if we didn't let him win...he went home. Your value system wasn't about things...it was who was a good baseball player, ran the fastest, swam farthest and even that wasn't enough if you were a mean kid or had an attitude. You were what you could and did do, not what you had.
Kids that got into fights at school - were often taken to the corner of the field and forced to fight it out until what ever wrong was less than the beating you were getting...coaches just watched. Principals at school paddled kids for infractions that warranted it ... and if the kid's parent(s) complained they were told to make their kids behave or they would be banned from school for a few days - such kids misbehaved like that home enough, the parents did what they had to, so their kids could go back to school.
If you broke a window with a rock, ran across a neighbor's flower garden, mistreated an animal, left trash in the neighbor's yard...any adult would tell your parents. If the parents didn't fix that, their reputation suffered to be no better than their kids and were shunned.
AND TODAY?
AND TODAY?
I blame it on Mister Rogers...he liked them "just the way you are"...so the bad ones kept on...and the good ones didn't think they had to improve.
I blame it on a liberal society that made being liked and politically correct more important than being honorable and respected.
I blame it on adults who were more concerned about making their children happy than good, who felt they had to entertain bored children or they didn't love them as parents...to stop them from whining.
In a previous generation if you were whining it was usually for having to do some chore and it mattered not one whit...because you still had to do it and if you didn't stop there would be no allowance on Saturday...and you knew there wouldn't be. Teens were grounded for cursing. Younger ones got their mouths washed out with soap - it wasn't considered poisoning and it was a nasty taste in your mouth that was harder to get out than those words..
I blame it on a liberal society that made being liked and politically correct more important than being honorable and respected.
I blame it on adults who were more concerned about making their children happy than good, who felt they had to entertain bored children or they didn't love them as parents...to stop them from whining.
In a previous generation if you were whining it was usually for having to do some chore and it mattered not one whit...because you still had to do it and if you didn't stop there would be no allowance on Saturday...and you knew there wouldn't be. Teens were grounded for cursing. Younger ones got their mouths washed out with soap - it wasn't considered poisoning and it was a nasty taste in your mouth that was harder to get out than those words..
What does this all mean?
Successively worse from one generation to the next, parents parent less and children rule more. The older generation enjoyed prosperity and good times and therefore could afford to provide more for their children and did. Their children as parents thought it natural to give their children more than just the necessities...to be loved as they loved their parents and giving equated to love...but both parents had to work in order to afford that. The next generation felt entitled to more than the necessities and demanded them...from any adult, teacher, care giver (remember Mister Rogers said it) or it was permissible to disrespect, vandalize and steal. The Ten Commandments weren't taught, respected...or even understood except that it was what "the man" dictated to be ignored when it suited.
Successively worse from one generation to the next, parents parent less and children rule more. The older generation enjoyed prosperity and good times and therefore could afford to provide more for their children and did. Their children as parents thought it natural to give their children more than just the necessities...to be loved as they loved their parents and giving equated to love...but both parents had to work in order to afford that. The next generation felt entitled to more than the necessities and demanded them...from any adult, teacher, care giver (remember Mister Rogers said it) or it was permissible to disrespect, vandalize and steal. The Ten Commandments weren't taught, respected...or even understood except that it was what "the man" dictated to be ignored when it suited.
What it means is that people expect to receive, not give, and they don't have to earn it ! Respect, money, friendship, love, property, food, medical care and you name it whether necessity or more...earning it is more difficult than demanding it, if that works. Many people living "off the system" actually believe that they have earned their public dole for having stood in line waiting for it.
Many people enjoy national security, but because they didn't earn it themselves, they think they are just entitled to it...or they can just pay mercenaries for it (professional soldiers in an all volunteer versus citizen Army, or pseudo-military organizations that hire out to protect in foreign lands)
Many people enjoy national security, but because they didn't earn it themselves, they think they are just entitled to it...or they can just pay mercenaries for it (professional soldiers in an all volunteer versus citizen Army, or pseudo-military organizations that hire out to protect in foreign lands)
When does that change?
When prosperity and luxury is replaced by impoverishment...and that day is rapidly approaching...and that applies to children, adults, towns, states and nations. Yet today we still are "politically correct" to encourage the taking of what we have by those unwilling to earn it.
Mother said, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Amen!
When will it get better?
When we earn it!
When prosperity and luxury is replaced by impoverishment...and that day is rapidly approaching...and that applies to children, adults, towns, states and nations. Yet today we still are "politically correct" to encourage the taking of what we have by those unwilling to earn it.
Mother said, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Amen!
When will it get better?
When we earn it!
Thursday, June 05, 2008
A schism of Catholicism in the making...in America?
Word spread like wildfire in Catholic circles: Douglas Kmiec, a staunch Republican, firm foe of abortion and veteran of the Reagan Justice Department, had been denied Communion.
His sin? Kmiec, a Catholic who can cite papal pronouncements with the facility of a theological scholar, shocked old friends and adversaries alike earlier this year by endorsing Barack Obama for president. For at least one priest, Kmiec's support for a pro-choice politician made him a willing participant in a grave moral evil.
Kmiec was denied Communion in April at a Mass for a group of Catholic business people he later addressed at dinner. The episode has not received wide attention outside the Catholic world, but it is the opening shot in an argument that could have a large impact on this year's presidential campaign: Is it legitimate for bishops and priests to deny Communion to those supporting candidates who favor abortion rights?
A version of this argument roiled the 2004 campaign when some, though not most, Catholic bishops suggested that John Kerry and other pro-choice Catholic politicians should be denied Communion because of their views on abortion.
The Kmiec incident poses the question in an extreme form: He is not a public official but a voter expressing a preference. Moreover, Kmiec -- a law professor at Pepperdine University and once dean of Catholic University's law school -- is a long-standing critic of the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision.
Kmiec, who was head of the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel in the late 1980s, is supporting Obama despite the candidate's position on abortion, not because of it, partly in the hope that Obama's emphasis on personal responsibility in sexual matters might change the nature of the nation's argument on life issues.
Kmiec has drawn attention because he is one of the nation's leading "Obamacons," conservatives who find Obama's call for a new approach to politics appealing. Kmiec started life as a Democrat. His father was a soldier in the late Mayor Richard J. Daley's Chicago political machine, and Kmiec's earliest political energies were devoted to Robert F. Kennedy's 1968 campaign.
But like many Catholic Democrats, Kmiec was profoundly attracted to Ronald Reagan. For him, five words in Reagan's 1980 acceptance speech summarized the essence of a Catholic view of politics: "family, work, neighborhood, peace and freedom."
In an interview over the weekend, Kmiec argued that 35 years after Roe, opponents of abortion need to contemplate whether "a legal prohibition" of abortion "is the only way to promote a culture of life."
"To think you have done a generous thing for your neighbor or that you have built up a culture of life just because you voted for a candidate who says in his brochure that he wants to overturn Roe v. Wade is far too thin an understanding of the Catholic faith," he said. Kmiec, a critic of the Bush administration's Iraq policy, added that Catholics should heed "the broad social teaching of the church," including its views on war.
Kmiec shared with me the name of the priest who denied him Communion and a letter of apology from the organizers of the event, but he requested that I not name the priest to protect the cleric from public attack.
The priest's actions are almost certainly out of line with the policy of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. In their statement"Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship," issued last November, the bishops said: "A Catholic cannot vote for a candidate who takes a position in favor of an intrinsic evil, such as abortion or racism, if the voter's intent is to support that position."
The "if" phrase in that carefully negotiated sentence suggests that Catholics can support pro-choice candidates, provided the purpose of their vote is not to promote abortion.
Already, Archbishop Joseph F. Naumann of Kansas City has played an indirect role in the 2008 campaign by calling on Kathleen Sebelius, the popular Democratic governor of Kansas who has been mentioned as a possible Obama running mate, to stop taking Communion because of her "actions in support of legalized abortion."
But because Kmiec is a private citizen and has such a long history of embracing Catholic teaching on abortion, denying him Communion for political reasons may spark an even greater outcry inside the church.
Kmiec says he is grateful because the episode reminded him of the importance of the Eucharist in his spiritual life, and because he hopes it will alert others to the dangers of "using Communion as a weapon."
I suppose using Communion as a weapon by denying it is still better than being ex-communicated...or is it the same? This was a violation of Canon Law.
However, other meddlesome priests have been thwarted in past history with significant impact. The USCCB is not in control, nor (allegedly) is Cardinal Roger Michael Mahony Archbishop of Los Angeles? This is the Cardinal who advised his priests to ignore the immigration bill and accepted a settlement of $660 million to victims of clerical sexual abuse in that archdiocese (Boston was just a mere $157 million).
This begs the question, has Catholicism been denied to America by the very men who administer it? I do not ask for defense, denial or otherwise speak against/for Catholicism ... or errant priests. I also remember that in 2004, our local priest spoke from the altar that is was morally wrong for anyone to vote for a candidate who espoused/accepted legal abortion.
"Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship A Call to Political Responsibility " (USCCB) is so obtuse as to confuse a high school graduate, and possibly even a legal scholar like Professor Douglas Kmiec former Dean and St. Thomas More Professor of the law school at The Catholic University of America. Somehow I doubt the priest who denied Communion to Kmiec nor my local parish priest acted against the direction of their bishop...of course the bishops can claim plausable deniability.
Is there another schism of Catholicism in the making in America?
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
"Undisclosed Recipient" emails from a person who has never ever sent me a personal note.
Some people have a group name which includes most of the addresses they have and they send anything of interest to everyone in that group name...
Sometimes when I receive such an email, I know that the person who sent it was just broadcasting and the email really isn't something the author thinks would be of interest to me.
EXAMPLE: I got an email addressed to "Undisclosed Recipient": It was an article telling people who wish to, how to gain weight. If you know me, that email was not applicable to me at all.
I have chosen to send emails to several people in a single email addressed to "Undisclosed" which is not a group address...then I BCC people from my address book that I think will specifically benefit...for that email.
SO! You know this email is specifically meant for you...and no one else sees your address in the TO: or CC: block (to maintain any privacy for your address).
Each time I send to Undisclosed, I select exactly to whom it will go...EACH TIME. It takes a minute or so extra time for me, but it avoids sending you an email about how to gain weight (if you are even slightly as heavy as I am - grin).
I urge you to consider a similar method of your own. Why? Because broadcasting to everyone in your address book or to a large number of them, indiscriminately, is like telling a story out loud in the middle of a bus station :
(1) some people don't think you are talking to them and don't listen
(2) some people disregard any email not specifically addressed to them (unless they know you have purposely selected them)
(3) some people broadcast everything they get in email as a forwarded item
(4) persons who you really want to read the email for important information often put off reading such emails.
(5) I grow weary of receiving emails addressed to "Undisclosed Recipient" from people who I would like to think are thinking of me, only to realize I was put on a distribution list long ago; the sender is just doing a "quick and dirty" mailing to a group that hasn't been updated and I've really been forgotten (which is okay, just update your group listing and quit bugging me). I have received dozens of Undisclosed emails from a person who has never ever sent me a personal note and to whom I have not written in years.
Sometimes when I receive such an email, I know that the person who sent it was just broadcasting and the email really isn't something the author thinks would be of interest to me.
EXAMPLE: I got an email addressed to "Undisclosed Recipient": It was an article telling people who wish to, how to gain weight. If you know me, that email was not applicable to me at all.
I have chosen to send emails to several people in a single email addressed to "Undisclosed" which is not a group address...then I BCC people from my address book that I think will specifically benefit...for that email.
SO! You know this email is specifically meant for you...and no one else sees your address in the TO: or CC: block (to maintain any privacy for your address).
Each time I send to Undisclosed, I select exactly to whom it will go...EACH TIME. It takes a minute or so extra time for me, but it avoids sending you an email about how to gain weight (if you are even slightly as heavy as I am - grin).
I urge you to consider a similar method of your own. Why? Because broadcasting to everyone in your address book or to a large number of them, indiscriminately, is like telling a story out loud in the middle of a bus station :
(1) some people don't think you are talking to them and don't listen
(2) some people disregard any email not specifically addressed to them (unless they know you have purposely selected them)
(3) some people broadcast everything they get in email as a forwarded item
(4) persons who you really want to read the email for important information often put off reading such emails.
(5) I grow weary of receiving emails addressed to "Undisclosed Recipient" from people who I would like to think are thinking of me, only to realize I was put on a distribution list long ago; the sender is just doing a "quick and dirty" mailing to a group that hasn't been updated and I've really been forgotten (which is okay, just update your group listing and quit bugging me). I have received dozens of Undisclosed emails from a person who has never ever sent me a personal note and to whom I have not written in years.
Friday, May 23, 2008
Give 'em a Big Mac and Fries
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
I got this from a friend's email. But I have comments to this below.
Trinity United Church of Christ adopted the Black Value System written by the Manford Byrd Recognition Committee chaired by Vallmer Jordan in 1981. They believe in the following 12 precepts and covenantal statements. These Black Ethics must be taught and exemplified in homes, churches, nurseries and schools, wherever Blacks are gathered. They must reflect on the following concepts:
1. Commitment to God
Please read the "Black Value System" again -- only this time, substitute the word "White" for "Black."2. Commitment to the Black Community
3. Commitment to the Black Family
4. Dedication to the Pursuit of Education
5. Dedication to the Pursuit of Excellence
6. Adherence to the Black Work Ethic
7. Commitment to Self-Discipline and Self-Respect
8. Disavowal of the Pursuit of "Middleclassness"
9. Pledge to make the fruits of all developing and acquired skills available to the Black community
10. Pledge to Allocate Regularly, a Portion of Personal Resources for Strengthening and Supporting Black Institutions
11. Pledge allegiance to all Black leadership who espouse and embrace the Black Value System
12. Personal commitment to embracement of the Black Value System.
If your church had such a "White Value System" Jesse and Al and the NAACP would have 10,000 demonstrators out front in a heartbeat.
So I read up to this point and started to agree when I realized that both perspectives were flawed in consideration of the problems we face.
Try substituting American instead of white or black ...we are all in this together and white versus black never solved anything then or now.
1. Commitment to God [ But our judicial system and legislative bodies have denigrated reference to God]See it this way:
2. Commitment to the American Community [ So many immigrants now wish to be Mexicans or Latinos in America and not to be an American]
Commitment, dedication and allegiance used so often above, are sadly unused in real life today except towards the self.3. Commitment to the American Family [ How many "whole" families versus how many "single
parent/broken/dysfunctional" families?]
4. Dedication to the Pursuit of Education [ Americans in our institutions of learning
consistently score less than foreign students]
5. Dedication to the Pursuit of Excellence [ Made in USA no longer means good quality and hasn't for thirty years]
6. Adherence to the American Work Ethic [ We have three and four generation families who have all lived entirely based on welfare]
7. Commitment to Self-Discipline and Self-Respect [ Too many athletes in sports prove this is not a goal they desire or their fans expect ]
8. Disavowal of the Pursuit of "Middleclassness" [ Whever this means, middleclass is a very
narrow target and getting slimmer daily]
9. Pledge to make the fruits of all developing and acquired skills available to the American Community [ Only if the salary/price is right ]
10. Pledge to Allocate Regularly, a Portion of Personal Resources for Strengthening and Supporting American Institutions
[ We're still trying to support outselves while our government supports other nations that
despise us and panders to multinational corporations that bleed us of jobs, skills, and money]
11. Pledge allegiance to all American leadership who espouse and embrace the American Value System [ This is probably the hardest one. Too many of our "leaders" and political organizations
are in a foreign nation's pocket]
12. Personal commitment to embracement of the American Value System. [ Not if they can't shop at Wal-Mart ]